|
|
But most technologists speak and make "technical" terms fashionable (IoT, AI, Machine learning, BigData, BlockChain, CloudComputing/Edge Computing, Digital Twins, CyberSecurity, etc.) ... but they are not (we speak) We are) so good at helping non-technologists, people, entrepreneurs, governments who have purposes of enabling initiatives, through available technology. We must raise the level of the conversation a few more layers, get away from the mere powerful technical terms of Fashion... because if the "terms" have power... it is unimaginable the POWER that the purposes that help to leverage have.
We have unfinished business there! Precisely for this reason, I really Denmark WhatsApp Number Data appreciate your article... because it manages to "translate" and "land" the essence of the words that identify technology. I remember that when I was studying engineering, the "fashion" was "intelligent" programming languages » and «expert systems»… that… how are they different from today's technology (AI, BigData, for example)? perhaps in the level of sophistication and maturation, in the possibility of its massification given that the internet that makes everything omnipresent did not exist, but there was the technology, there were the needs to do interesting things, there is the Social Commitment...what was missing ?
There was a lack of "understanding the technology (at whatever level it was) and how to put it at the service of purposes" and the "political and real will to do something with it." I do not see "monopolies" of something enabled by technology, I don't see new social companies. Yes, I see that the world has changed and we all have to move there or we are out of it!!!! The "DigitalValue Divide" will not only be associated with having "the resources" to adopt technology and its advantages or that the technology is "affordable." Let's remember that almost everything is susceptible to "digitization", but "values" (as well as emotions, feelings) ... are not digitizable.
|
|
發表於 16:08:21